Why the AWS CEO Thinks Replacing Junior Workers with AI Is a Huge Mistake
In a tech industry that’s practically sprinting toward an AI-powered future, it’s refreshing—borderline shocking—to hear a CEO say something that doesn’t sound like it was written by ChatGPT on corporate autopilot. Amazon Web Services (AWS) CEO Matt Garman recently dropped a truth bomb in an interview with AI investor Matthew Berman, calling the idea of replacing junior employees with AI “the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard”.
And honestly? He’s got a point.
Why Junior Workers Still Matter (Even in an AI World)
Garman’s argument is simple but solid: junior employees are cheap, eager to learn, and—here’s the kicker—actually good at using AI tools. They’re the ones doing all the work and research! Experimenting, adapting, and figuring out how to make AI work in real-world workflows. So why would you cut the very people who are best positioned to evolve with the tech?
“If you go 10 years into the future and you have no one that has built up or learned anything,” Garman said, “how’s that going to work?”
Spoiler: it won’t.
AI Isn’t the Villain—Misusing It Is
To be clear, Garman isn’t anti-AI. He’s bullish on its potential to transform every job, every company, and every industry. But he draws a line between transformation and replacement. AI should be a tool, not a pink slip generator.
That said, the timing of his comments is… awkward. Amazon recently laid off hundreds of AWS employees, and while the company didn’t explicitly blame AI, CEO Andy Jassy previously hinted that AI-driven efficiency would reduce headcount over time. So yeah, the optics are a little messy.
The Real Problem: Short-Term Thinking
Garman’s stance highlights a deeper issue in tech: the obsession with short-term gains over the long-term benefits. Replacing junior staff with AI might look good on a quarterly report, but it guts the talent pipeline. You can’t build a future-ready workforce if you’re too busy automating away the people who would’ve become your next generation of leaders.
You know, the ones that nit-pick and agonize over the AI to make sure it assits the way they want it to. Yeah, you don’t get rid of those employees that would take the industry to the next level.
Final Thoughts: Hire the Intern, Not the Algorithm
In a world where AI is being treated like a cure-all for corporate inefficiency, Garman’s comments are a rare dose of common sense. Junior workers aren’t dead weight—they’re the foundation. And if your company’s future depends on innovation, maybe don’t fire the people most likely to bring it.
Because let’s be real: AI can write code, crunch data, and even generate snarky headlines. But it can’t replace curiosity, mentorship, or the messy, human process of learning. Not yet, anyway.
